Google -30 Penalty
I never experienced penalties from Google in all my online career. Maybe sandbox one or two times but that I don”t consider as a penalty. Since I never experienced them I never thought that penalties really exists or everything is coincidence. Yesterday I was on this thread and realized that this site maybe got -30 penalty for low quality backlinks. Cases are simply to similar. This page was on number 6 at Google, then I started link building campagn and asked my friends to give me backlinks. In the short time at least 15 people responded giving me massive amount of mostly forum signatures, few hours later my entry dropped for exactly 30 positions from position 6 to position 36. After that until now my Oes Tsetnoc entry flawed between positions 32 and 39, and this morning is on position 42.
Am I being paranoic or this penalty things really exists? How can webmaster control backlinks, if this is true then you can easily cause penalty to your opponents?
Or maybe this only work for new and young sites, which means that penalty if exists will be lifter? I am not sure what to do, to slow down linking process because of this
or to continue as nothing happened?
I would appreciate your words for this issue, since I am completely on a unknown territory.
Even I was unknown to this penalty thing. Well I think being too fast isn”t a good idea.
Just don”t rush for the things. Be steady in beginning.
And no matter what happens don”t lose hope because – “Doing your best is more important than being the best”
Comment by Gautam Chadha — September 18, 2009 @ 11:26 am
You seem to have recovered now. Within a couple of days. Position 1 now. Good luck, stay still
Comment by Snak3 — September 20, 2009 @ 3:52 pm
Oops, guess you were referring to another site and not this. Sorry for the confusion.
Comment by Snak3 — September 20, 2009 @ 3:53 pm
They call it the ”google bomb” type of effect. This is however very temporary and lasts only a few days or weeks. I”ve been thru this in one of my sites.
Comment by dee — November 7, 2009 @ 9:42 am